<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Public Sector Travel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chart of the week: the fall in business mileage by Greg Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/08/04/chart-of-the-week-the-fall-in-business-mileage/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=22980#comment-688</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see if the private car mileage goes up this year, after the tax office has raised the mileage allowance to 45p per mile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see if the private car mileage goes up this year, after the tax office has raised the mileage allowance to 45p per mile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GDS incentives: an opportunity for Government? by </title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/08/04/gds-incentives-an-opportunity-for-government/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=22988#comment-687</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aviation carbon emissions: tensions rise over ETS by Barrie May</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/07/27/aviation-carbon-emissions-tensions-rise-over-ets/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=22671#comment-686</guid>
		<description>It seems that US airlines are unhappy about having to pay a tax on carbon emissions that all other airlines will be subject to  in Europe.  If these airlines are given special treatment, then other carriers that pay the tax or convert renewable fuels will be put at a disadvantage.  Are these US airlines also going to protest against having to pay the airport taxes which are used to help pay for upkeep of the infrastructure on which they depend.  Why then would they protest against a carbon tax which is designed to assist investment in renewable fuels for their future energy needs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that US airlines are unhappy about having to pay a tax on carbon emissions that all other airlines will be subject to  in Europe.  If these airlines are given special treatment, then other carriers that pay the tax or convert renewable fuels will be put at a disadvantage.  Are these US airlines also going to protest against having to pay the airport taxes which are used to help pay for upkeep of the infrastructure on which they depend.  Why then would they protest against a carbon tax which is designed to assist investment in renewable fuels for their future energy needs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An open book by </title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/07/07/an-open-book/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=21999#comment-676</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strike rate by </title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/06/16/strike-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=21045#comment-674</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government acts to extend contracts access to SMEs by sfitzpatrick@airplus.com</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/06/03/government-acts-to-extend-contracts-access-to-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>sfitzpatrick@airplus.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=20488#comment-673</guid>
		<description>The Government has consistently adopted a head-in-sand approach to SME inclusion, and any claims to the contrary are purely for the sake of political posturing. 

SMEs are continually being marginalized as the government blindly pursues its &#039;quick win&#039; policy of soaking up any direct bankable savings it can lay its hands on.

There is no plan B, and any efficiencies which could have been gained through SME inclusion are all but abandoned with the promotion of aggregated procurement. 

Whether the ERG or Cabinet Office like it or not, the increased focus on rebate ensures that the highest bidders take all. There is little attention to areas of continuous efficiency improvement through adoption of streamlining solutions or by embracing innovation. Qualities that many SMEs bring to the table. 

Aggregated procurement ensures that terms such as &#039;best fit&#039; or &#039;most economically viable&#039; seldom apply. And why would they, when Buying Solutions are promoting the concept to members as an opportunity to realise an improved rate of rebate, forgoing any mention of process optimisation or efficiency gains. 

SMEs will never compete in such a market place, and once rebate cheques have been banked or reallocated, we will be left with the same process inefficiencies which has seen the government scrambling together such initiatives in the first place. Only then we will be left with less choice, less competition and the very real risks of creeping margins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has consistently adopted a head-in-sand approach to SME inclusion, and any claims to the contrary are purely for the sake of political posturing. </p>
<p>SMEs are continually being marginalized as the government blindly pursues its &#8216;quick win&#8217; policy of soaking up any direct bankable savings it can lay its hands on.</p>
<p>There is no plan B, and any efficiencies which could have been gained through SME inclusion are all but abandoned with the promotion of aggregated procurement. </p>
<p>Whether the ERG or Cabinet Office like it or not, the increased focus on rebate ensures that the highest bidders take all. There is little attention to areas of continuous efficiency improvement through adoption of streamlining solutions or by embracing innovation. Qualities that many SMEs bring to the table. </p>
<p>Aggregated procurement ensures that terms such as &#8216;best fit&#8217; or &#8216;most economically viable&#8217; seldom apply. And why would they, when Buying Solutions are promoting the concept to members as an opportunity to realise an improved rate of rebate, forgoing any mention of process optimisation or efficiency gains. </p>
<p>SMEs will never compete in such a market place, and once rebate cheques have been banked or reallocated, we will be left with the same process inefficiencies which has seen the government scrambling together such initiatives in the first place. Only then we will be left with less choice, less competition and the very real risks of creeping margins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Card games by </title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/06/03/card-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=20479#comment-672</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local councils accused of paying staff inflated mileage rates by 89222704</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/04/15/local-councils-accused-of-paying-staff-inflated-mileage-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>89222704</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=18566#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Presumably any mileage at rates higher than the current HMRC approved levels needs to be disclosed to HMRC so that this excessive reimbursement can be taxed at the recipient&#039;s highest marginal tax rate.

Speaking as a Finance person working in one the larger central government departments where we can only claim up to 40p for the first 6,000 miles and have to claim a tax rebate separately for the difference between our 25p /mile rate on any mileage above 6000 miles, I think it&#039;s true that some local authority staff have never had it so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably any mileage at rates higher than the current HMRC approved levels needs to be disclosed to HMRC so that this excessive reimbursement can be taxed at the recipient&#8217;s highest marginal tax rate.</p>
<p>Speaking as a Finance person working in one the larger central government departments where we can only claim up to 40p for the first 6,000 miles and have to claim a tax rebate separately for the difference between our 25p /mile rate on any mileage above 6000 miles, I think it&#8217;s true that some local authority staff have never had it so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on East Coast ticket giveaway in bid to lure air passengers by jonathan green</title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/03/24/east-coast-ticket-giveaway-in-bid-to-lure-air-passengers/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=16710#comment-655</guid>
		<description>With the recent government committed to reduce domestic air travel by 20% over the next five years (WWF-UK found that 90% of government air travel was on domestic routes), public sector travel buyers are under ever increaingly pressure to find effective ways to manage demand and change the behaviour and, in turn, realise cost and carbon savings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent government committed to reduce domestic air travel by 20% over the next five years (WWF-UK found that 90% of government air travel was on domestic routes), public sector travel buyers are under ever increaingly pressure to find effective ways to manage demand and change the behaviour and, in turn, realise cost and carbon savings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya, ash and illness: crisis management in travel by </title>
		<link>http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/2011/03/02/libya-ash-and-illness-crisis-management-in-travel/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicsectortravel.org.uk/?p=15743#comment-613</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

